Logo

The U.S. Department of Education

The U.S. Department of Education (DOE) website is being redesigned to improve educational access and excellence, creating a more user-friendly and accessible platform. Focused on better serving primary users—students, parents, educators, policymakers, and community members—this UX/UI bootcamp project provides clear, essential information on student loans, grants, and educational resources.

Project Type

  • Government Agency Web Redesign

Timeline

  • 2 Weeks

My Role

  • UX Researcher
  • IA Designer
  • UI Designer
  • IxD Designer

Tool Used

Project Overview

The Problem

The website promotes student achievement and global competitiveness through educational excellence and equal access. However, other sites fail to make crucial loan and grant information easily accessible, driving users away.

How can the Department of Education website be developed to increase user success based on page traffic and link clicks?

The Solution

Enhancing the Department of Education website's user experience for parents of high school seniors can streamline student loan and grant research, improve accessibility, and increase user success through better page traffic and link clicks.

Design Process

1. Research Phase

  • Pitch ideas
  • User persona
  • Define user path
  • Heuristic evaluation
  • Competitor analysis
  • Usability test

2. Ideation Phase

  • IA-card sorting
  • Sitemap
  • User flow
  • Wireframes
  • Mobile wireframe
  • UI style tile

3. Design Phase

  • UI Style Guide
  • Mobile UI Design
  • Desktop UI Design

4. Test Phase

  • usability plan
  • Usability test
  • Test Analysis

Assumption

Target Users

Parents of Seniors Students.

Needs

They need Support with college financial planning, like loans and grants, to ensure family stability, along with tools to stay engaged in their children’s education and manage work-life balance.

Challenge

How might we redesign the U.S. Department of Education website to create a more user-friendly, accessible platform for parents, students, and educators, ensuring easy access to critical information on student loans, grants, and educational resources? Our goal is to improve navigation, enhance information accessibility, and increase engagement through a design that fosters educational success and supports users in making informed decisions.

Research

Research Goal

To gain insights from real users on the usability and clarity of the U.S. Department of Education website. We aim to understand their challenges, preferences, and needs when accessing information on financial aid, grants, and educational resources.

Research Method

  • Usability Testing
  • User Interviews: 1 on 1 interviews & Behavioral Interview
  • Heuristic Evaluation Analysis

Key Questions:

Navigation

  • How easy is it to find grant and loan information?
  • What sections or terms confuse you?

Content Organization:

  • Is the information organized clearly?
  • Does the amount of information feel overwhelming?

Language and Accessibility:

  • Are language options sufficient?
  • Do terms or steps seem unclear?

01. Usability Testing

Objective

  • Measure ease of navigation and clarity in each task.
  • Identify points of confusion or delays.
  • Gather user feedback on improvements for streamlined navigation and better information flow.

Key Tasks

  • Find Pell Grant Information: Locate and list steps for Pell Grant eligibility.
  • Get Started with Discretionary Grant Applications: Identify the process and total steps for starting a discretionary grant application.
  • Apply for a Grant: Navigate to the application section, find suitable grants, and initiate the application process.
Original Website
Orginal website

Key Takeaway

Users find it hard to navigate the U.S. Department of Education website due to confusing sections, too much text, and unclear links. Simplifying the navigation, adding clearer visuals, and making language settings easier to find can help users quickly access important information about grants and loans.

Navigation

Hard-to-find language settings, broken links, unclear paths, and overwhelming buttons/categories.

Content and Information Clarity

Confusing sections (e.g., “Grants” vs. “Student Loans”), inconsistent terms, dense text, poorly placed guidance.

Information Overload

Heavy text, difficulty selecting correct links.

Visual Design

Distracting colors, lack of engaging icons/carousels.

External Links and Terminology

Confusing redirects, unfamiliar terms (e.g., FSA ID), translation challenges.

02. User Persona

In the previous step, we conducted usability testing to understand how real users navigate the U.S. Department of Education website, focusing on challenges they face in finding financial aid information. From these tests, we observed common pain points like confusing navigation, overwhelming text, and unclear grant vs. loan distinctions. Creating Maria’s persona consolidates these findings, representing a primary user type—a parent managing their child’s education finances.

User persona
User persona

Maria Gomez, a 46-year-old office manager, seeks student loans and grants for her child's college expenses. She's tech-savvy and involved in her child's education but worries about the financial impact of debt and is unsure where to start with grants.

03. Empathy Map

Maria’s challenges with managing college expenses and navigating financial options highlight the need for clear, simplified information on grants and loans. This insight informed our website redesign by focusing on:

  1. Streamlined navigation for financial resources.
  2. Easy-to-understand guidance on loans and grants.
  3. Tools to plan and estimate costs effectively.
Empathy Map
Empathy mapping

04. Competitor Analysis

Our competitor analysis by Patrick (team memeber) shows competitors use dynamic visuals but suffer from clutter or dullness. The redesign will focus on clear navigation, balanced visuals, and engaging aesthetics for a clean, user-friendly homepage.

Competitor analysis
Competitor analysis form by Patrick

05. Heuristic Evaluation analysis

Homepage

The U.S. Department of Education website faces key usability and accessibility issues, including inconsistent navigation, excessive links, lack of error recovery in the search bar, missing alt text for images, poor color contrast, and inadequate accessibility features like WAI-ARIA attributes. Addressing these challenges with clearer navigation, simplified content, and accessibility improvements will enhance user experience and inclusivity.

The "Student Loans, Forgiveness" section struggles with jargon, inconsistent link styling, scattered information, and missing definitions. Accessibility issues include lack of alternative text, poor contrast, and insufficient ARIA attributes. Centralizing information and improving design and accessibility will greatly enhance usability.

Student loans page
Grants page

The "Grants" section of the U.S. Department of Education website highlights several usability and accessibility issues. Usability concerns include jargon-heavy language, inconsistent link styling, a missing email icon, and uneven spacing in bullet points.

Accessibility gaps involve missing alternative text for buttons, insufficient guidance for external links, and the need for larger buttons to support users with mobility impairments. Addressing these problems with clearer language, consistent design, and accessibility improvements will significantly enhance the user experience.

06. User path

This wireflow shows the user path through the U.S. Department of Education website, focusing on accessing student loans and grant applications. Key observations from our UX/UI research include:

User path
User path (Wireflow)

07. Initial Usability test

We conducted usability testing to uncover navigation issues and confusing instructions in the grant application process. These insights helped us improve the website’s clarity, accessibility, and user experience.

Usability test Usability test
Usability testing plan
Usability report
Usability testing report

Testing revealed confusing navigation, dense content, and visual distractions. Users struggled with broken links, unclear sections, and overwhelming text. These findings guided us to simplify navigation, reduce text, and improve visuals for a smoother user experience.

Pain points
Pain points data

Ideation-phase

Card Sorting

After synthesizing the initial usability data, we moved into the ideation phase to brainstorm design solutions within the project scope. This process allowed us to develop a clear and user-friendly structure for the website, ensuring users can easily find and understand information.

1. Create Cards & Shuffle:


  • Random content cards were created for Student Loans, Grants, Homepage, and Footer sections. The cards were shuffled to eliminate bias.

2. Group & Label:


Participants grouped related cards and labeled categories. For example:

  • Student Loan Page: Application, Eligibility, Loan Management.
  • Grant Page: Introduction, Application Process, Grant Opportunities.
  • Homepage: Primary Navigation, Policies, Financial Aid.

3. Structure:


Groups were organized into a clear hierarchical structure:

  • Student Loans: Application, Eligibility, Services.
  • Grants: Educational Institutions Grant, Student Grant, Grant Policies.
Card sorting process on Figjam with the team

Site Map

This sitemap shows the restructured navigation for the U.S. Department of Education website. Key sections are clearly organized to improve user experience.

This structure simplifies navigation by grouping related content, making it easier for users to find loans, grants, and resources. The clear organization supports an intuitive experience, reduces confusion, and helps users access key information quickly.

Site map flow created as team

Design Phase

Wireframes

As a team, we worked together to create the initial wireframes and designed simple interactions to quickly test usability.

1st set of wireframes we decided to go for team's feedback

Feedback

During this process, we noticed several important areas for improvement:

Team's feedback report

Top Navigation Bar

The navigation wasn’t visually noticeable enough, so users might overlook it.

Hero Banner

The hero banner on the homepage felt plain and lacked interactive elements to engage users or encourage actions.

Press Release Section

The press release area needed clearer separation from other sections to avoid users accidentally clicking on it.

Secretary of Education

The clickable areas in the Secretary of Education introduction weren’t clearly marked, which made it hard for users to know they were interactive.

Student Loan Interface

The buttons on this page were too large, taking up unnecessary space and making the design feel unbalanced.

Iteration Phase

High-fidelity prototype

In the iteration phase of the DOE project, our team refined the designs based on feedback from the initial design phase and usability testing. We improved wireframes, streamlined navigation, and enhanced the interface to better meet the needs of students and educators.

This iterative process allowed us to optimize visual design and interactivity, delivering a more accessible and user-friendly experience.

Key updates included:

High fidelity prototypes

Mobile device design

These mobile wireframes are adapted from the desktop design, ensuring a seamless transition to smaller screens. Starting with desktop allows for establishing a clear information architecture and visual style, which are then streamlined for mobile. This approach ensures feature completeness, consistent branding, and an efficient, user-centered experience on all devices.

UI Style Guide

This UI Style Guide serves as a comprehensive reference for maintaining visual and functional consistency across the EDU project. It includes guidelines for typography, color schemes, iconography, and spacing to ensure an intuitive and accessible user interface. By adhering to these standards, we aim to create a cohesive design system that enhances usability and aligns with the project's educational goals.

Reflections

Key Takeaway

  • Improved Usability: Simplified navigation and clear structure enhance user experience.
  • Cohesive Design: Unified visuals foster trust and professionalism.
  • Accessibility First: Inclusive design meets accessibility standards.
  • User-Centered Approach: Research-driven solutions address user pain points.
  • Modern Look: Clean, professional aesthetic aligns with educational values.

Retrospective

  • Successes: Strong collaboration and user insights shaped a user-focused, accessible design.
  • Challenges: Balancing technical constraints with user needs and limited time for testing.
  • Lessons: Early usability testing and prioritizing accessibility lead to better outcomes.
  • Next Steps: Expand the design system and incorporate feedback for continuous improvement.